home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
pc
/
illusion
/
rock_fie.cxt
/
00258_Field_258.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-12-31
|
2KB
|
52 lines
How can these seemingly
contradictory examples be
explained? After all, in these
cases there is no real change in
perceived orientation when the
figure is tilted along with the
head because we remain
perfectly aware of which region
is the top of the face or of the
word. But, if these figures
remain upright and are not
tilted along with the head, a
difficulty does arise. For simple
material it is easy enough to
achieve the proper description
despite the retinal abnormality
of orientation of the image. In
viewing a square with the head
tilted 45 degrees, for example,
it is easy enough to recover the
fact that its sides are
horizontal and vertical, which
is the essence of perceptual
"squareness." But this process
of correction is far more
difficult to achieve when the
stimulus consists of multiple
parts, as is the case with the
letters making up words or the
features making up a face. If we
cannot correct all these parts
and the relation among them in
one operation, many will
remain uncorrected and thus
will be seen as if their tops and
bottoms were governed by
retinal orientation. That leads
to the wrong description. Our
initial lack of awareness of the
extreme distortion of the face
in the left-hand photograph
shown here is testimony to the
inadequacy of our perception
when the image is inverted on
the retina. Similarly, when
printed words are viewed upside
down, various letters are
incorrectly "described" on the
basis of their retinal
orientation--a u becomes an n,
or a d a p, and so forth.